Saturday, July 21, 2007
AP: SHORTAGE OF DOCTORS AFFECTING RURAL AREAS
As many of you know, I chair the FMG Taskforce, the coalition of physician immigration law firms that handle the bulk of the nation's physician immigration matters. If you are a doctor and your immigration lawyer handles physician cases regularly, the odds are pretty good that he or she is a member of our group.
We've been working on legislation to address what the AP is describing in their story from this morning. The article is on the mark in describing the problems associated with fewer foreign doctors going to rural areas. Rather than rolling out the welcome mat to foreign doctors to make them interested in staying in the US and working in areas really needing them, Congress and the White House have been doing a lot more to discourage them.
Case in point - the Department of Health and Human Services. In the story, HHS says that the reason it's program approves less than ten doctors a year is because of a lack of interest because of too few doctors seeking positions in rural areas.
That is a absolutely untrue! HHS killed its waiver program for all intents and purposes in 2002 when it changed its rules to only allow communities with "super-shortages" to apply. HHS promised after 9/11 to take over the Department of Agriculture's waiver program in 2002 after a meeting was held at the White House regarding the future of the waiver program. It opened a relatively good program in the summer of 2002 and had a number of applicants. Then it abruptly shut the program down in September 2002 and reopened in December with a number of rule changes that all but shut the program down completely.
I did an analysis that was cited in a Congressional Research Service report that showed that this rule change alone eliminated more than 80% of qualifying rural facilities. They also barred hospitals and private medical practices from applying and that effectively eliminated almost all of the rest. Senator Conrad recently introduced legislation to force HHS to open up its waiver program - to specialists, to private employers, to ALL shortage areas. Pass that legislation and then let HHS tell us there is no interest in the physician population.
I can't tell you exactly why HHS did what it did, but I can only assume the worst - that it wanted to kill the waiver program all together, but knew politically it could not. So they did the next best thing - make it so unattractive that no one would apply. And they have accomplished that. Hopefully, Senator Conrad will succeed in forcing them to do their jobs.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:32 AM
Comments:
Post a Comment
XML newsfeed
archives
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
July 2010
August 2010
November 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
August 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
September 2013
January 2014
March 2014
April 2014
July 2014
As many of you know, I chair the FMG Taskforce, the coalition of physician immigration law firms that handle the bulk of the nation's physician immigration matters. If you are a doctor and your immigration lawyer handles physician cases regularly, the odds are pretty good that he or she is a member of our group.
We've been working on legislation to address what the AP is describing in their story from this morning. The article is on the mark in describing the problems associated with fewer foreign doctors going to rural areas. Rather than rolling out the welcome mat to foreign doctors to make them interested in staying in the US and working in areas really needing them, Congress and the White House have been doing a lot more to discourage them.
Case in point - the Department of Health and Human Services. In the story, HHS says that the reason it's program approves less than ten doctors a year is because of a lack of interest because of too few doctors seeking positions in rural areas.
That is a absolutely untrue! HHS killed its waiver program for all intents and purposes in 2002 when it changed its rules to only allow communities with "super-shortages" to apply. HHS promised after 9/11 to take over the Department of Agriculture's waiver program in 2002 after a meeting was held at the White House regarding the future of the waiver program. It opened a relatively good program in the summer of 2002 and had a number of applicants. Then it abruptly shut the program down in September 2002 and reopened in December with a number of rule changes that all but shut the program down completely.
I did an analysis that was cited in a Congressional Research Service report that showed that this rule change alone eliminated more than 80% of qualifying rural facilities. They also barred hospitals and private medical practices from applying and that effectively eliminated almost all of the rest. Senator Conrad recently introduced legislation to force HHS to open up its waiver program - to specialists, to private employers, to ALL shortage areas. Pass that legislation and then let HHS tell us there is no interest in the physician population.
I can't tell you exactly why HHS did what it did, but I can only assume the worst - that it wanted to kill the waiver program all together, but knew politically it could not. So they did the next best thing - make it so unattractive that no one would apply. And they have accomplished that. Hopefully, Senator Conrad will succeed in forcing them to do their jobs.
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
July 2010
August 2010
November 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
August 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
September 2013
January 2014
March 2014
April 2014
July 2014